The United States has taken a significant step by signing off on a global agreement aimed at tackling the persistent issue of fake news, which has become a critical challenge in the digital age. This move marks the end of international collaboration efforts against misinformation, a decision that has sparked widespread debate and concern among those invested in maintaining the integrity of information.
The United States, as described by Matt Gertz, a senior fellow in the National Security branch and a disinformation expert, has left the European Union’s Code of Practice on Disinformation. This initiative, originally launched in 2018, aimed to unite online platforms, advertisers, and civil society organizations to address the surge of fake news and digital deception. The code, which included Facebook, Google, and Twitter, was designed to mitigate the spread of disinformation through measures like transparency in political advertising, increasing visibility of journalism, and preventing malicious behavior across platforms.
In March, European Union lawmakers took the Code of Practice a step further by incorporating expectations into the Digital Services Act legislation. The proposed measures included fines of up to 6% of a company’s worldwide revenue for continued dissemination of illegal content, the creation of annual transparency reports, and adherence to Selatan’s Master Framework to ensure "political ad transparency.” The EU’s efforts vowed to lead the way in tackling misinformation, shifting the burden from civil society groups to online platforms and lawmakers.
However, the U.S., under the administration of President Joe Biden, has expressed concerns about the potential infringements on targeted privacy by these compliance standards. With privacy being a prime directive, the U.S.‘s decision aligns with its historical stance on prioritizing freedom of expression. Its steadfast insistence on protecting U.S. citizens’ privacy has led to their non-compliance with the Code of Practice’s regulatory steps, leading to their withdrawal from the agreement.
Gertz elaborates on the EU’s unique approach, citing that their policies emphasize more on law enforcement, which contrasts with the U.S.'s approach that relies more on trust-building mechanisms with platforms. No single platform can be a human solution for factual verification in a society with such diverse and vast opinions, hence, maintaining that balance between what tools to bring into legislation was monumental.
The departure marks a shift in how the U.S. will handle disinformation going forward. While the country has voiced concerns about the impact of restrictive rules, it has committed resources to promoting digital literacy and media literacy initiatives. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Ransomware Vulnerability Warning Pilot emerged as a key commitment in this context, providing detailed insights into the threats posed by ransomware and empowering individuals and organizations to enhance their cybersecurity measures.
On addressing the decision, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman mentioned preserving “The U.S.’ free and open Internet” as the primary factor for distancing themselves from the EU’s regulation strategies, but that doesn’t mean their fight against misinformation is over. U.S. will continue its efforts to stem the tide of false information, with the latest initiative operating under the banner of “Countering Misinformation Initiative” Department, keeping up its practice of deflating misinformation by promoting media literacy across the United States.
This initiative is expected to be critical for the US citizens. As stated by Kyle Sheehan, an assistant professor at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications, “critical thinking skills” have become indispensable in the media-saturated modern world. Sheehan emphasized the importance of promoting media literacy and fostering a healthy skepticism towards information sources, which aligns with CISA’s training program that aims to educate Americans on identifying fake news to navigate through it.
What are your thoughts on this? I’d love to hear about your own experiences in the comments below.